The Farmer's Sons

APRIL SMITH'S TECHNOLOGY CLASS

The Farmer's Sons

23/2/2016

268 Comments

After you read The Farmer's Sons, click on the comment link and answer the following question:

What was the major conflict in the story?

Then click on another person's response to the question and comment on their blog.

Do you agree or disagree with their comment? Why?

The Farmer's Sons

A farmer dies leaving behind two grown sons and their families. The farmer left a will. The will explained what the farmer wanted to do with the land, money, and possessions that he left behind. The farmer loved both of his sons, so he said divide the land down the middle. Give one son the right half and one son the left half.

So, his sons built homes and began to plant their crops on the land their father had left them. Unfortunately, the creek and pond are both on the left half of the farm. A drought comes to the area. The son farming the left half of the farm is able to irrigate his crops using the pond and creek. The son farming the right half os the farm is forced to watch as all his crops begin to whither and die. The son farming the right half asks the son farming the left half if he can use the pond and creek to irrigate his crops too. The son farming the left says, "I'm sorry. I'd love to let you but the creek and pond are almost dry. I don't know if I will even have enough to keep my own crops alive." The son farming the right becomes angry, saying, "Our father wanted us to share this land. He would not have wanted you to control all the water." The son farming the left says, "I'm sorry. It is just the way things happened. I legally own this side and I do not want you taking my water."

That night after the son farming the left went to bed, the farmer on the right set fire to the farmer on the left's crops. The farmer on the left woke up and saw his whole crop a blaze. He ran to the pond and creek and threw bucket upon bucket of water on the fire until finally the fire was out, but in doing so drained his pond and creek dry. Now he was out of a crop and a water supply.

268 Comments

smith group 5

15/3/2016 08:45:51 am

the main conflict is when he says he can't share his water with his brother and his brother burns his crops

makayla

16/3/2016 09:56:12 am

i agree because i put the same thing but more specific.

Jake link

16/3/2016 11:06:37 am

Watch your grammar😟

Jake link

16/3/2016 11:04:34 am

That is good,but don't PQA

Kaden Eady link

16/3/2016 11:39:01 am

I think the main idea of this passage is that violence is not always the answer.

jayson(msbyars)

16/3/2016 11:52:42 am

that is the tension?????

Ja'Darah Byars

16/3/2016 11:42:03 am

I agree because thats the same thing i put .

Haley F link

16/3/2016 11:51:13 am

The main conflict of the story is the brother on the left side was stingy with his water [pond] and the other brother burned the other brother's crops because he wanted his revenge because he couldn't get any water.

Laure Kilgore

16/3/2016 11:58:51 am

I agree with you

Mykiah

23/5/2019 08:09:35 am

I agree, because the point that there wasn't water to be shared led to the brother burning the crops

Sydnie Lunsford, Marissa Dempsey, Daniel Rudder

15/3/2016 08:46:09 am

I think the major conflict of this Story is When the brother on the right side asked for water from the brother on the left side to get some water and he said no. The brother on the right side was mad and burn all of the brother on the left side crops and making him drain all of his water.

group 5

15/3/2016 08:48:52 am

I agree with group 7 because he made the brother on the left side drain all the water because the right side brother burned all the crops

bradley reyer

15/3/2016 02:33:41 pm

awesome

Jake link

16/3/2016 11:09:32 am

Very nice explanation

Caitlynne Grounds

15/3/2016 08:55:37 am

I agree with Sydnie because it was't right for him to burn the crops because he was mad.

Waylon Rose

15/3/2016 01:48:47 pm

I agree with Caitlynne because now both of the brothers can't farm because the creek is dried all the way up and there is no water source for any of them.

olivia,

15/3/2016 08:56:20 am

I disagree with what you think because the right side son did not make the left side son drain all of his water because he was more worried that he would not have egnoph to provide food and drink for his family.

SEC

15/3/2016 01:41:08 pm

I agree with your answer.

alana

15/3/2016 02:23:22 pm

i agree w/ Sydnie Daniel andMarissa.

Abby

15/3/2016 02:25:20 pm

I think this is a good conflict of the story because that is the most interesting part of the story

Shea butler

15/3/2016 02:28:36 pm

I agree with this

Selah Butler

15/3/2016 02:35:43 pm

👆🏻that was supposed to be SELAH BUTLER but spell check put it as shea!!!😡

Anna Staggs (Holt)

15/3/2016 02:29:45 pm

I agree with this because it explains what happens. short sweet and to the point yes still a good explanation. nice job

Tyler Voss Byars

16/3/2016 11:44:38 am

I agree with you anna it really does explain what happens when the farmer on the left goes to sleep and his crops go to blaze and he uses up all the water and has no more food and no more water to live.

Brooklyn

15/3/2016 02:33:17 pm

I agree with Sydnie's group because of their explanation.

alana

15/3/2016 02:38:25 pm

i think the major conflict is that the brother share the water when they could share equally

Dylan Finley link

16/3/2016 02:04:48 pm

they didn't share the water equally you did it wrong.

diego

16/3/2016 09:01:46 am

i agree

alexis

16/3/2016 09:02:25 am

i agree that makes since because thats what they did

makayla grinfield

16/3/2016 09:59:40 am

i agree with you !

Jake link

16/3/2016 11:07:48 am

2 long 2 read

Alexandria Woodall link

16/3/2016 11:18:03 am

I agree with Sydnie.

Gracie Berthiaume Byars

16/3/2016 11:50:24 am

I agree with you because that is a major conflict that happened in the story.

jake jennings

15/3/2016 08:47:31 am

the brothers should not have fight over water

olivia martin

16/3/2016 08:58:54 am

well i agree but it was not right that the left side son burned
the right side son's crops.

Alan Nguyen link

16/3/2016 01:12:41 pm

i agree because it makes sense

Anzlea Zach Carea Caleb

15/3/2016 08:47:43 am

The major conflict is the farmer on the left had the pond and the farmer on the right want to share the pond and the farmer on the left said no so at night the farmer on the right burnt down all the crops on the left side

group 6

15/3/2016 08:50:59 am

y'all did not support your answer so i don't agree

group 5

15/3/2016 11:24:17 am

y'all did support your answer so i like yours.

Smith group 6

15/3/2016 08:47:51 am

The left side had water and the right side did not and the left side did not give any because there was a drout so the right side burnt all of the right sides crops.

15/3/2016 08:53:03 am

you said the right side burns the right sides crops

CGHG

16/3/2016 01:22:07 pm

I agree with you group 6

daniel

15/3/2016 08:48:14 am

i think he shar water

jake jennings

15/3/2016 08:50:28 am

good job

anzlea

16/3/2016 08:58:14 am

not good spelling and plus thats not what happened

makayla

16/3/2016 10:02:18 am

i agree spelling not so good.

connor

16/3/2016 08:59:09 am

it is share not share

jay

16/3/2016 08:59:51 am

so bad

SMITH GROUP 1

15/3/2016 08:48:31 am

The left side was hogging the pond and the right sides crops died because a drought came.

Tyler smith

16/3/2016 09:56:31 am

The left side was noggin the water and then the right sons crops died because the left side son hogged the water so the right sid son set fire the the crops

Amanda Byars

16/3/2016 11:50:33 am

I kind of agree but not 100%

Smith 4

15/3/2016 08:49:10 am

I thought that it was not fair that the right son burned the crop of the left son.

daniel

15/3/2016 08:50:05 am

they shod of got fishing

TYNE AND CONNOR

15/3/2016 01:41:02 pm

It's should.

logan

16/3/2016 08:59:34 am

lol good spelling

Emmaie

16/3/2016 09:00:04 am

Try to do it don't try to be funny because you'll get in trouble and i don't agree. 😄

diego

16/3/2016 09:00:19 am

its they should gone fishing

Smith 5

15/3/2016 08:50:17 am

That they don't show how to share the form together so the former on the right said band his crop the end reeyee

15/3/2016 01:49:27 pm

*farm; farmer; burned;reeyee?
not bad fam
just the spelling

Nick Burrell

15/3/2016 08:51:07 am

the one on the left would give the right water but the left said i would give you some right but i don't have enough so the left guy wasnt being mean

candy byars

16/3/2016 11:48:47 am

i agree with you nick

alexis may

15/3/2016 08:51:17 am

the one on the right was wrong to burn is brother crops just because he wouldn't give him any water

Caitlynne Grounds

15/3/2016 08:51:27 am

We think it is not fair for the right side son to burn the left side son's crops.

Smith-Group 5

15/3/2016 08:51:36 am

I think the major conflict in the ''Farmers Sons'' is the brother on the right says his plants are withering and dying, the brother on the left says that he will not share. The conflict is the bros don't know how to share!

ashlyn

15/3/2016 08:51:48 am

i think the left brother should of shared but the right brother should have not made a big deal out of this.

diego link

15/3/2016 08:52:56 am

i think that they should share and don't fight about it

ashlyn hilyer

15/3/2016 08:55:49 am

that is kind of what i said

carea

15/3/2016 08:52:57 am

the conflict of the story is that the farmer on the right hade no water and the farmer left did so when the farmer went to sleep he burned his crops an drains all his water

jay swindall

15/3/2016 08:53:19 am

the son on the right was not good because he buret his brother crops.the left wood give him water but he did not have it.

brody Schüler bbc

16/3/2016 09:01:19 am

i agree with jay. FaZe tip

Jaquita davis link

15/3/2016 08:54:03 am

the prob is that they didn't share the water from the crop that the dad gave him !!!!

SEC

15/3/2016 01:39:44 pm

you need to spell you words right.

Jaquita davis

16/3/2016 09:03:42 am

Prob is for problem

J.K.F. ~Jaylon Fields~

16/3/2016 01:18:18 pm

its *problem* not *prob* but you know,you right,I agree.

group 8 smith

15/3/2016 08:54:55 am

the son with the right land was being mean and burnt the left son crop and made him drain his crops

Smith 5

15/3/2016 08:55:03 am

he did not show if he had a not anuf water

Brandon Creamer,Andrew Goodwin,Austin Jones

15/3/2016 11:24:32 am

we do not agree with sidnie because it dose not makesence

dghjf

15/3/2016 01:42:59 pm

i like to jam with my fam

Andrew (Mcnutt) link

16/3/2016 11:11:16 am

I like to jam with my fan is not the main idea

McNutt Group 3

15/3/2016 11:24:55 am

the farmer on the right was being selfish and when the farmer on the left said he could not have water for his crops the right side farmer was being a brat.

zack

15/3/2016 01:41:57 pm

i agree with this because it has the reason why it is correct and what was the conflict

Group 4

15/3/2016 11:25:11 am

We agree with Sydine Lunsford's group because they have more detail about the conflict of the story.

Jordan Henderson

15/3/2016 01:38:50 pm

who is in this group?

Group 4

16/3/2016 11:05:30 am

Sydney, Marissa,and Daniel

Wendt group 8

15/3/2016 01:34:43 pm

The left brother should have let the right brother use some of his water and the right brother shouldn't have burned the left brothers crops.

anna marie

15/3/2016 01:36:11 pm

i agree

THE REAL ANNA

15/3/2016 01:36:55 pm

THAT WAS NOT ME!!!!

Caleb

16/3/2016 01:16:07 pm

I agree

Damion moore

16/3/2016 01:20:32 pm

i agree 2

Wendt Group 6

15/3/2016 01:36:39 pm

The major conflict in the story is the son on the left half didn't want to share his pond and creek with the son on the right half which started the disagreement between the two.

Jordan Henderson

15/3/2016 01:40:49 pm

I agree because it gives great detail about the problem between the two sons

Jordan Henderson

15/3/2016 01:36:48 pm

I think the main conflict of the story is when the brother on the right asks for water for his crops and the brother on the left says no this caused tension between the two.

Toan Nguyen link

16/3/2016 11:52:33 am

I agree with you because you put how the conflict was created and how they had tension between them.

Wendt 5

15/3/2016 01:37:29 pm

The major conflict of this story is that the son that owns the right side of the land thinks it is unfair that the son on the left side has the pond and the creek. The son on the left side will not share the pond or creek so the son that owns the right side get angry and they both get in a disagreement.

Makenzi Richardson

15/3/2016 01:40:16 pm

I agree

I Like Turtles

15/3/2016 02:28:57 pm

This is a Conflict because there was tension when he set fire to the left sons crops.

AGF link

16/3/2016 01:30:46 pm

I agree with you because you explained your conflict really nicely.

Wendt group 2

15/3/2016 01:37:47 pm

I think both farmers were being selfish because the one on the left wasn't going to share and the one on the right burned the one on the lefts crops and over reacted

Brandon Hayes

15/3/2016 01:47:12 pm

I agree because they both did something they didn't need to do.

Wendt 3

15/3/2016 01:38:15 pm

We think that the left brother should have shared his water, but we also think that the right brother shouldn't have burned his crops just because he said no and he should've respected that he wanted to keep his crops alive.

Gretchen, Harrell

15/3/2016 01:43:49 pm

I agree.

briley,

15/3/2016 01:45:15 pm

this is not the conflict

Gretchen, Harrell

15/3/2016 01:39:23 pm

The conflict of this story is that the right land had all the water and the left side did not. When the son with the right land did not share it caused both sons pain.

table 7 link

15/3/2016 01:39:59 pm

the farmer on the right didn't want to share his water soooooooo the farmer on the left burned his crops

J.K.F ~Jaylon Fields~

15/3/2016 01:41:26 pm

The conflict of the story is that the farmer on the left didn't want to share his creek and pond,and the farmer on the right side got angry and burned the left sides crop. The farmer on the left side used up all of his water to put out the fire,at the end nobody got what they wanted.

Wendt group 5

15/3/2016 01:41:32 pm

The major conflict of the story is that,the son on the left has no water for his crops, but the sun on the right had a pond and a creek for his crops,but the son on the left wants to get some water cause he thought it was unfair but the son on the right said no.This caused a problem between the two sons.

Briley, winmam,zack

15/3/2016 01:41:47 pm

the main conflict is the left brother keep all the water when there was a drought so the farmer on the right had no water

Brandon Hayes

15/3/2016 01:47:21 pm

I agree because it tells what happens in the story.

Jake

15/3/2016 02:38:01 pm

I agree with you Brandon :^)!

Group 5

15/3/2016 01:42:17 pm

I agree with group 6 because they told you specifically the main problem between the two sons.

MAT

15/3/2016 01:42:53 pm

I agree with Sydnie's group, because they explained very well and explain the conflict.

AGF,GMS

15/3/2016 01:43:15 pm

We think that the sons' resolution should be that they should had split the land so that both have an access to water.

TYNE AND CONNOR

15/3/2016 01:44:38 pm

We think the conflict of this story is the person on the left side of the farm should have shared his crops that were grown with his brother. But, the brother on the right side had no right burning his crops.

Myah Mincey

15/3/2016 02:31:27 pm

I disagree about the burning his crops part he should have.

Winman, Zach, Billy Bob

15/3/2016 01:45:22 pm

I think the major conflict is that the son have the left land have all the water and the son have the right doesn't have any water.

AGF,GMS

15/3/2016 01:45:33 pm

We think that the 2 sons conflict is that they split the farm unevenly one person got more supplies than the other.They should solve this conflict by splitting the farm evenly.

SEC

15/3/2016 01:46:21 pm

The major conflict of this story is the right side crops were dying and he needed water the left side had a pond and the right side asked for some water but the left side didn't have a enough of water for the both of them and and right side got mad and in the middle of the night the right side set the left sides farm on fire.

SUMMER

15/3/2016 02:26:05 pm

i agree because it was a conflict that there was any water for the right son and the left son will not share

alexis

16/3/2016 08:56:57 am

i like what u said summer it makes since

Table 7;Alan Nguyen; Wendt

15/3/2016 01:46:33 pm

The farmer on the left got greedy and kept the pond and creek to hisself and the farm on the right got angry so he burned the farmer on the left sides crops. The farmer on the left side used all of his water to put out the fire. In the end nobody got what they wanted.

Aurora

15/3/2016 02:29:26 pm

I agree with this comment because what the left farmer did not share the water and kept it to himself and at the end nobody got what they wanted.

Winnie the pool, Billy Bob, Zachery

15/3/2016 01:47:45 pm

NO, idk wat they r saying

Kame

15/3/2016 02:20:38 pm

The conflict is that there is a drought, and there is not enough water to support their crops.

Jordan Alvarez

15/3/2016 02:41:37 pm

I disagree because the conflict is when the brother wouldn't share his water when there was a drought and the other brother set his crops on fire.

Abby Fox

15/3/2016 02:20:51 pm

i think the major conflict of this story is that the sons do not get along so they had a disagreement and that turned into WAR between the two sons

alexis

16/3/2016 09:00:19 am

that makes since i think they was having a war between the two

Angel

15/3/2016 02:21:12 pm

The conflict of the story is that the brother on the left side would not let the other brother have any water for his crops.

Ashford Fowler

15/3/2016 02:21:37 pm

The conflict was there is a drought and the farmer on the right needs water but the farmer on the left wouldn't let the right farmer use his water.

Kara Clifton

15/3/2016 02:22:35 pm

I think the conflict is when a drought comes to the area and the son farming the left half of the farm is able to irrigate his crops using the pond and creek, but the son on the right side unfortunately has no pond or creek and he has to let his crops wither and die.

Dylan .

15/3/2016 02:28:43 pm

I think she is right because this is were the tension was.

Kayla, Anna link

16/3/2016 11:08:40 am

We agree with you Kara. That was very good!

Madelyn Hall link

16/3/2016 11:52:02 am

I agree with Kara Clifton

Darly S.

15/3/2016 02:22:53 pm

The conflict is " the left did not give the right side the water."

Arianna Schrom

15/3/2016 02:22:53 pm

I think the conflict is one side needs water but all of it's on the other side and the left side ( With water ) is not sharing any with the right side( No water ).

~summer~

15/3/2016 02:23:06 pm

The main conflict in this story is that there is no water for the son on the right side but the son on the left has water but he will not share with the other son

Adam Holt

15/3/2016 02:23:29 pm

the conflict is that the right side farmer wants the left sides water but he will not give him any because he doesn't have enough and i agree with SEC

Alexa Mena :)

15/3/2016 02:23:35 pm

I think the major conflict was about how the guy farming the right side wanted some of the water from the creek and pond on the left side but the guy farming the left side would not let the guy farming the right side have some of the water for his crops. ;)

~summer~

15/3/2016 02:24:04 pm

The main conflict in this story is that there is no water for the son on the right side but the son on the left has water but he will not share

CORY (holt)

15/3/2016 02:24:04 pm

The conflict is that there is a drought and the right farmer burned the left farmers field of crops because he is a greedy beaver. #FaZe Platypus

Alexa Mena :)

15/3/2016 02:24:20 pm

Dylan .

15/3/2016 02:24:21 pm

The conflict is the farmer on the right needs water for his crops and the left want let him use it so when the farmer on the left went to sleep the farmer on the right set the farmer on the lefts crops on fire and in the end neither one got what they wanted.🇮🇪

cory (holt)

15/3/2016 02:26:11 pm

🇮🇪

Kame

15/3/2016 02:26:30 pm

That is not a conflict that is a main idea. 😂

Thomas

16/3/2016 11:38:49 am

😂

Arianna Schrom

15/3/2016 02:24:40 pm

I think the conflict is one side needs water but all of it's on the other side and the left side ( With water ) is not sharing any with the right side( No water )

Poturlte Charlie

15/3/2016 02:24:46 pm

Well The Farmer On left Love The Land And Apart To the drought but on the right Got greedy He need water to So He Got salty And Burned HIs brother crops down

bradley reyer

15/3/2016 02:25:14 pm

the conflict is that there is a drought and the farmer on the right side wants some water from the left farmer but the left farmer dosen't want to give him any water so the right farmer decided to burn the left sides crops when he was asleep because he wanted the water so bad.

Anna Staggs (Holt)

15/3/2016 02:25:33 pm

I myself can understand were Both farmers are coming from. I've felt like burning crops and I've felt like being stingy. But, I have learned that sometime you are concerned for Yourself. They could have shared the crops or shared them with a ration. Although sometime you do not feel like sharing or you may feel like running out the other person may feel like you just want to keep it ALL to yourself. Either way they both end up with NOTHING.

Brooklyn

15/3/2016 02:25:48 pm

I think the conflict is the left side farmer didn't want to share the water with the right side farmer so while the right side farmer was asleep the left side farmer set fire to the right side farmers crops.

Logan #nothingness#

15/3/2016 02:36:02 pm

Very close, although the RIGHT farmer burned down the LEFT farmer's crops. Why is everyone messing this up?

Aurora

15/3/2016 02:26:59 pm

The major conflict in this story is the right side farmer wanted some water for his crops,and when he asked the left side farmer which is his brother,the left brother said no.And when the left farmer was asleep the right farmer set fire to the crops,and when the left side farmer went to pour water on the crops to get the fire out,there was no more water for the both of them.

Marissa Dempsey

16/3/2016 08:59:18 am

i agree with you i like the way you explained your answer

Selah Butler

15/3/2016 02:27:22 pm

I think the conflict is, the right side farmer burned the left side farmers crops and in the process of putting out the fire, drained all of his water sources and then no one had water and they probably died.... what SHOULD have happened was, the right side farmer and the left side farmer should have tried to compromise and if the left side farmer still didn't want to share (that would just be rude at this point) the right side should have just been ok with it.

Khushi Modi

15/3/2016 02:36:18 pm

I agree with you because even though it didn't say what happened after he used up his only water source left to put out the fire, and in the end no one actually had any water unless the drought ended.

Emily

16/3/2016 08:57:32 am

i agree Selah good job.🤘🏽

Sydnie Lunsford

16/3/2016 08:58:22 am

I agree with this because you were right when you said the left should have shared with the right side. And it wasn't fair the left side has water and the right side does not.

Brandon(McNutt)

16/3/2016 11:08:17 am

I agree with Selah because it makes sense.

Selah Butler link

16/3/2016 02:06:13 pm

Mine makes know sense!! its so long...I don't even know anymore...

Devin Davey

15/3/2016 02:27:43 pm

The left farmer who had the water source did not let the right farmer have any even though the right farmer had no water to use on his crops

Adam Holt

15/3/2016 02:27:50 pm

the conflict was that the farmer on the right side wants the water from the left side but he won't give him any and i agree with SEC

Khushi Modi

15/3/2016 02:29:03 pm

The conflict is that both of the farmer's sons have to share the land their father had left for them and they decided to divide it in half. Which ended in one son having the side with both the pond and creek when a drought happens. The son without the pond or creek burns the crops of the son with the pond and creek.

Danny Holt

15/3/2016 02:29:39 pm

I think the conflict of the two farms sons are that one son has no water and the other the other has a bit of water but does not give water to the other farm.

Blake C. and Makayla S. HOLT

15/3/2016 02:29:57 pm

the farmer on the left deserved it he should have gave the farmer on the right some water to help his crops.

Myah Mincey

15/3/2016 02:30:16 pm

I think the major conflict in the story is the left side farmer does not give any of his water to the right side farmer.

Kaitlyn Quiles

15/3/2016 02:30:23 pm

The conflict of this story is that the farmer on the right needs water for his crops, but the farmer on the left won't give him any water because he barley had any water for his crops. So as a result the farmer on the right set all of the farmer on the left side's crops.

#Cortez

15/3/2016 02:30:29 pm

The conflict was the drought the fact the left side didn't have any water so he asked the right side for some water and the left side said no. That brought tension.

Devin Davey

15/3/2016 02:38:17 pm

I agree except for the fact that the right side was the one who asked for water not the left

Devin Davey

15/3/2016 02:31:02 pm

I agree with Brooklyn,Aurora,Selah,and Adam

Jake

15/3/2016 02:31:59 pm

The farmer who owned the left side didn't share even though the other farmer didn't have any to irrigate his crops.

Jordan Alvarez

15/3/2016 02:32:26 pm

I think they should have had the lake for one brother and the creek for the other brother. Also they should talked to each other or tried to work something out.

alana isbell

15/3/2016 02:32:42 pm

i agree w/ Sydnie ,Daniel ,and Marissa

#Cortez >:(

15/3/2016 02:34:23 pm

I made a typo. Leave out the first sentence ends at drought.

Cortez

15/3/2016 02:37:26 pm

I agree with jake

Logan #nothingness#

15/3/2016 02:44:53 pm

I think that the main conflict was that the right farmer, who I am going to call "Jimmy" was mad because his brother, who I'm going to call "Tim" , wouldn't give him his creek ( or stream ) during a drought because the water levels were low, and Tim couldn't give any water to Jimmy, although he obviously wanted to. So, when Tim was asleep, greedy old Jimmy burned Tim's crops down, so Tim used all the water from the ponds and creeks to put out the fire. So now, neither of them had water.

Anna, Kayla { McNutt }

16/3/2016 11:10:41 am

Thats good

group 6

16/3/2016 08:54:29 am

i agree with logan

logan

16/3/2016 08:58:01 am

spell right danil

Anzlea Struecker

16/3/2016 08:56:22 am

i agree with Kara Cliftons passage because it has lots of details from the story plus it somewhat in PQA

jay

16/3/2016 08:57:48 am

casey

16/3/2016 08:59:45 am

jay

16/3/2016 09:01:18 am

do it just do it.

casey

16/3/2016 09:01:32 am

ye ye

Monolisa,Midnight

16/3/2016 09:02:19 am

Dispite that they are brothers they should have shared the water in the first place.

Joshua Smith yeeyee

16/3/2016 09:02:54 am

I think that they need to stop acting like babys and sher the from and water yeeyee

Joshua Smith

16/3/2016 09:12:23 am

thay was moving into a now house but he had a dog and his butter got mad and tod the boy to kip his dog on his side he did

jaylen smith

16/3/2016 09:51:41 am

I think they should share the water

brockblack

16/3/2016 09:58:46 am

they should also share the land

Allen Group 6

16/3/2016 09:53:12 am

I believe the conflict is that the brother with the pond doesn't want to share with the brother without the pond witch causes a fire.

brock

16/3/2016 10:03:50 am

porchia toney

16/3/2016 09:54:33 am

The brother on the right was being selfish and would not let the brother on the left use the water.

Jairo Ochoa

16/3/2016 11:10:23 am

I agree with you porchia because the brother on the right was being selfish.

Allen Group 4

16/3/2016 09:54:34 am

The Conflict when the right side person burnt the left sides crops.

Allen group 5

16/3/2016 09:54:43 am

I think it is when the brother on the left doesn't share his water with the brother on the right.

allen group 1

16/3/2016 09:54:57 am

i think the conflict in this story is the left side was not willing to share the water so the right side set fire to the left sids crops and they ran out of water when he was putting out the fire

logan tortorigi

16/3/2016 09:56:05 am

the conflit was that the brother on the left would not let the brother own the right have any water so the bother on the right burt the crop and use all of the brother water

brockblack allen

16/3/2016 09:57:03 am

i think they should quit crying about the land and just share with each other

Hailey,Kristina,Kelly,Hannah TABLE 2 ALLEN

16/3/2016 09:57:39 am

We think that it is wrong to split their land because it causes them to fight over the water and it made the son on the right side to burn all of his crops on the left side and we think it is fair just to share the whole land instead of splitting it up.

taylor

16/3/2016 09:58:28 am

i think the conflict is that the brother with the water needs to share but he doesn't so the brother starts a fire.

group 1

16/3/2016 09:58:39 am

the conflict of the story is,the left side wouldn't share his water with the right side so,the right side burned the left side's crop the left side put out the fire but in the process using all his water. the left side is left with nuthin.

Matt Johnson

16/3/2016 09:59:27 am

The conflict is that the farmers split the land and one farmer got mad that the other farmer has the creek and the sun on his side while the other farmer's crops are having to whither and die.

jaelyn

16/3/2016 09:59:58 am

the farmer son divided the land in two and the right side dry up and the crops died ten he ask the lift side son if he could brow same water but he said no then when he he burned it down but the son throw water on it.

Juan Huerta-Salazar

16/3/2016 10:00:07 am

I think the conflict is the brother didn't share his land with his other brother

logan > t

16/3/2016 10:01:55 am

i agree because his brother didn't share so yes

Todshaye link

16/3/2016 11:50:39 am

I agree because they didn't share and they should have helped each other out since they are brothers

hayden allen

16/3/2016 10:01:45 am

the conflict was that they split the land and caused them to fight

jacob walker

16/3/2016 10:02:39 am

i think the conflict is that the right half brother wanted to also youse the pond but the left half brother sead no so the right brother got mad and bernt down his brother crops

Jennis-Allen

16/3/2016 10:06:03 am

I don't agree that the the right farmer shouldn't have burned the left side because the left farmer couldn't have helped the right farmer.

Nikki Mr.Mc Nutt

16/3/2016 11:01:12 am

I think the farmer should have left the left side half of the water instead of the right side having all the water

Ashton Siefke

16/3/2016 11:04:00 am

I think they should share the half of the lake so they will not be fighting over it.There dad said before he died share the lake!!!

Hollie Graham(Mcnutt)

16/3/2016 11:05:38 am

I think the main conflict in the story is that the brother on the left wouldn't share his water with his brother on the right when he asked.

Kayla

16/3/2016 11:07:05 am

That dose not make sense.

braxton

16/3/2016 11:48:53 am

yes kayla it does make sense bc i can understand how a son doesn't wanna share his water because it is his land so if u finally put a reasonable answer then just comment it back.

Conner Denley link

16/3/2016 11:43:26 am

Mckenzie Phillips link

16/3/2016 11:47:41 am

I agree 100%

Cross Cole link

16/3/2016 11:49:39 am

I agree too, u did goooooooood,btw u da best

Gracie D link

16/3/2016 11:52:54 am

I agree with this. Good job.

Kaden Eady link

16/3/2016 11:53:46 am

like it

Conner Denley link

16/3/2016 11:56:40 am

Good

Aaron Davis (Byars)

16/3/2016 11:43:36 am

The major conflict in the story is when the father died and the father's sons wouldn't share land/water, then the brother on the right set fire to the left side's crops.

Sage Gardner link

16/3/2016 11:47:10 am

Very Good

Owen Newton link

16/3/2016 11:51:14 am

They shared the land not the water

Conner Denley link

16/3/2016 11:54:46 am

this dose not make sence

Mckenzie Phillips link

16/3/2016 11:44:50 am

The major conflict is when the brother with the lake on the wouldn't let the brother on the right side use his water then there is dominos effect

Tyler Voss byars

16/3/2016 11:50:13 am

Good answer

cross Cole link

16/3/2016 11:51:30 am

I agree with uuuuuuuuu

Aaron Davis (Byars)

16/3/2016 11:51:42 am

I agree with that answer. Good Job!

Sage Gardner link

16/3/2016 11:45:04 am

The main conflit is both farmers grow greedy.

Aaron Davis (Byars)

16/3/2016 11:46:13 am

That was a good answer

Tyler voss

16/3/2016 11:47:58 am

very good answer sage

Blake Coker

16/3/2016 02:05:11 pm

I disagree because I think the farmer on the left was greedy and the farmer on the right was just asking

Cross Cole link

16/3/2016 11:45:34 am

The main conflict of this story is Self - Interest Corrupted the left farmer's farm and the right side farmer grew angry and made a crises for the left side farmer and destroys his crops.

Tyler Voss byars

16/3/2016 11:49:12 am

i agree with you CROSS COLE.

Thomas :)

16/3/2016 11:50:47 am

wow

Amanda Riggs

16/3/2016 12:03:54 pm

I agree with you
- Amanda Riggs

Candy Byars

16/3/2016 11:45:40 am

the major conflict was that he was out of crops and water supply

Gracie D link

16/3/2016 11:51:49 am

i agree with this.

Marianna Boggess

16/3/2016 11:45:40 am

The major conflict is that the brother on the left is not sharing his water so the brother on the right sets his crops on fire so that the brother on the left will have to use all of his water o put the fire out.

Conner Denley link

16/3/2016 11:51:42 am

i agree with u becals yours is a little like mine

Owen Newton link

16/3/2016 11:46:23 am

The major conflict in "The Farmer's Sons" is that the brother with the water won't share the water with his brother.

Aaron Davis (Byars)

16/3/2016 11:47:36 am

good job!

Todshaye link

16/3/2016 11:46:41 am

The major conflict in the story is that the Farmer's sons are fighting over supply for their crops. The left side feels that he shouldn't share the water supply with the right side. The right side feels that his brother should share his water.

Gracie D link

16/3/2016 11:46:48 am

The conflict is the brothers fighting over the water sources.

Toan Nguyen link

16/3/2016 11:46:48 am

The conflict is that the two brothers are fighting over the water sources.

Kaden Eady link

16/3/2016 11:52:09 am

Nice and simple Toan,I like it !lol

Madelyn Hall link

16/3/2016 11:46:54 am

The conflict is the two brothers fighting over their water sources.

Ja'Darah Cole link

16/3/2016 11:47:03 am

I think the main conflict is when the left side brother was being stingy with his water so the right side brother burned the crops and so the left side brother had to use all his water.

braxton

16/3/2016 11:47:21 am

to me hes acting stingy and don't agree with kayla bc it does make sense that he doesn't wanna share part of his land comment back if u understand yet kayla.

Gracie Berthiaume Byars

16/3/2016 11:47:30 am

I think the major conflict is that the farmer on the right needs water, to water his crops and the farmer on the left has a lake and a creek but he doesn't want to let him have any water.

Marianna Boggess

16/3/2016 11:51:56 am

I agree with you because the farmers song that had the left side did not share his water.

Byars Group 5

16/3/2016 11:47:47 am

The main conflict is that the brother on the left side is being stingy with his resources, and so the brother on the right side takes revenge, and burns his brothers crops.

Amanda Byars

16/3/2016 11:47:48 am

The major conflict in this passage is when the farmer on the left refuses to let the farmer on the right use some water for his crops. If the farmer on the left would have let the farmer on the right use the creek or pond their would have been no conflict.

Joshua Reeser link

16/3/2016 11:48:05 am

I'm agreeing with the left side because it wasn't the right side brothers land and he didn't have the right to set the left side crops on fire so he had to use the water to put it out so he ran out of water.

Kaden Eady link

16/3/2016 11:48:17 am

I think the main idea of this passage is that the guy on the left side didn't have enough water for the two of them and that created a conflict between the brothers and it ended in ruining both their crops.

Brandon .J link

16/3/2016 11:48:23 am

I think the major conflict in the story is that only 1 son got water on their side. Patricia (Lauren) also agrees with me. We think the dad should have split the land to where both sons got water on their side.

Mya Smith link

16/3/2016 11:48:38 am

The conflict is that the brothers are not being rational about sharing the creek.The first brother should have shared but the second brother should not have burned down the crops.because the first brother could have changed his mind.

Lauren Kilgore link

16/3/2016 11:48:53 am

The major conflict in the story " The Farmers Sons" is that the first farmer should have let his brother have some of the water and they then they could have split the crops evenly. ;)

Thomas Williams :) link

16/3/2016 11:49:29 am

I think the conflict of the story is that the one son has a creek & and a pond, the other son docent have water. One A drought comes to the area. The son farming the left half of the farm is able to water his crops using the pond and creek. The son farming the right half is the farm is forced to watch as all his crops begin to die. ♻︎

devanta russell

16/3/2016 11:50:33 am

I agree BJ

Nariah Jackson link

16/3/2016 11:51:02 am

The main conflict in the story was that the farmer son on the right wanted to use the farmer son on the left pond and creek to irrigate his crops but the farmer son on the left wouldn't let him so, that night the farmer son on the right lit fire on the farmer son left crops and when the farmer son on left had use all his water to let out the father.

jayson(ms.byars)

16/3/2016 11:51:08 am

I think the major conflict between the farmers is that the right farmer and the left farmer is that the left farmer wonted water and the right didn't won't to give him any so the left farmer burned the right farmers crops. the right farmer wonted to to keep the crops alive and the left farmer wonted to also but the right wonted to keep there crops alive

Ila Segars link

16/3/2016 11:51:20 am

The main conflict in the story is that the two sons half the farm land. One brother has one side with all the water. The other brother doesn't have any water and wants some. So one day, the brother with no water asks the brother with all the water if he could use some of the water to water his crops. The brother with the water says no. So that night, the brother with no water sets fire to the other brothers crops.

Kaden Eady link

16/3/2016 11:55:45 am

I Agree % 100! Nice

Aaron Davis (Byars)

16/3/2016 11:58:10 am

That was a great answer but I don't agree 100% because you didn't mention that the brother used up all his water to put out the fire.

cory land

16/3/2016 01:57:29 pm

i agree

16/3/2016 11:52:54 am

yep

devanta russell

16/3/2016 11:55:15 am

THE CONFLICT IS THE LEFT SIDE IS BEING STINGY OF THE WATER

Dylan Finley link

16/3/2016 02:01:01 pm

The conflict is they have to share the farm half and half.The left side has all the water.The right needs water but the left want let him, so he goes and burns the lefts crops at night while he is sleeping.

Dylan Finley

16/3/2016 02:02:27 pm

wont*

The Farmer's Sons

The Farmer's Sons

Leave a Reply.

April Smith